
A rtunes video. Johh Witterick explains how Banks manufacture money out of thin air but yet charge you interest you have to work hard for to pay off. Fractional Reserve Banking has been a bane…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
A rtunes video. Johh Witterick explains how Banks manufacture money out of thin air but yet charge you interest you have to work hard for to pay off. Fractional Reserve Banking has been a bane…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
all this banks are criminal institution
j.pmorgan pay 13.5 BILLIONS $penelty
bank of america pay 16.5 BILLIONS $ penelty
wells fargo ?
is anybody in jail ?????
comman Bozena you wane play fer with this criminals ????
Also, credit cards are the REAL cause of identity theft. Credit cards
enable you to get into debt by spending money you don’t have. Credit cards
raise the prices of goods and services even if you pay them before any
interest is accrued because they typically charge the merchant 3% for their
service – which the merchant charges YOU.
Credit cards cause a loss of financial privacy. Every thing you purchase
with them is recorded, where you were, what you spent, and on what. Do you
really want anyone to have a record of your financial transactions? Why
isn’t it at least as difficult to obtain a credit card as it is to buy a
firearm? Why aren’t you photographed and fingerprinted? Because the
credit card companies want to ensnare as many victims as possible.
Get rid of your credit cards. They are nothing but trouble.
Awesome vid
They sell you numbers, give them numbers back with whatever numbers they
want as interest, legally it would be interesting to try it :)
Money is an acknowledgement or record of entitlement one receives in return
for giving up one’s own labour/production or property. Money comes into
existence as a further representation of our promissory obligations that we
have to each other. It is created out of our labour, production, goods and
services. No new money is ever issued by a bank without one of us first
signing a promissory note, or as banks like to (falsely) call it “a lone
agreement”. The promissory note is backed up with our ability to earn and
retire the money from existence with our very own labour and production.
This is where the whole fraud of banking comes into play. When a bank
issues OUR money it is in fact NOT a debt to the bank because the bank
gives up no value of its own and therefore risks nothing which nullifies
any legitimate claim the bank has to both the principle sum issued and
interest. However, there is still a debt. The debt is the sum of principle
that needs to be retired from existence by the person who created the money
in advance of earning it. But it is NOT the property of the bank, it is the
property of no one. The bank (falsely) claims that it loaned money to a
borrower and then (falsely) claims its taking a risk and so ads
(unwarranted) interest. There is a common misconception that money is
created by banks out of thin air. Anyone who says such a thing does not
fully grasp what money actually is. To say “money is created out of thin
air” is to first deny your very own victimhood, and then to ignore the
crime of theft the bank commits against all of us. I think the notion that
money is created out of thin air comes from the acknowledgment that banks
give up nothing of value when money is created and issued to us, but that
is not to say that we likewise give up nothing of value. We do give up
value; we give up our blood, sweat and tears. Banks do not create money at
all, let alone create it out of thin air. WE are the true creators of money
and we create it out of our labour and production. Banks merely publishes
OUR money. ALL DEBT TO A BANK IS A FICTION. If people only understood the
monumental crimes and fraud banking commits against us every day, and the
effects those crimes have on us and society, there would be no such thing
as banks and every banker alive today would be in hiding for fear of being
lynched by the people. Banks dispossess us of all our wealth because they
launder our wealth into their possession via a falsified debt to
themselves. When a bank makes a family homeless and takes their home they
actually get a house for absolutely 100% free. In other words, the bank
just stole the house. It’s also worth noting that at any given time due to
unwarranted interest by the bank the money supply in circulation is always
short of its represented property there by resulting in inevitable
foreclosures, bankruptcies, depressions, repossessions, unemployment,
poverty, homelessness, suicides, wars, starvation, and a whole host of
other human misery. There is nothing more intrinsically evil than banking.
There is nothing that even comes close to causing such great human
suffering on such a massive scale for such a long period of time as
banking. Banks were a creation of Satan. Our struggle should not be about
debt forgiveness or debt write-down’s from the bank, our struggle should be
about the abolition of the banking system itself. It’s estimated the world
is over $100 trillion in debt. Who in hell did the world supposedly borrow
all this from? Answer, nobody, it’s all FAKE debt to the banking system.
Why? Because the actual REAL debt has already been paid off, in multiples.
It’s the unwarranted interest that keeps the FAKE debt alive and keeps us
all enslaved to banks. If banking was abolished tomorrow around 96% of all
the worlds debt would be wiped out. Poverty would end overnight. As long as
we have banks intruding on our trade and commerce with each other the
economy will be never be anything more than just a lie.
For anyone who is truly seeking a new monetary justice as opposed to the
corrupt fraudulent system we have the misfortune to live with today then I
strongly recommend you study Mathematically Perfected Economy™. It is the
ONLY alternative because it identifies the problem correctly and addresses
those problems correctly. Below is a link to get you started if interested.
http://australia4mpe.wordpress.com/category/testimony-of-a-banker-about-a-foreclosure/
..,If you need help with bill collectors , get the legal letters at :
http://www.stopbillcollectors.bizupstarts.biz
Why can’t we pay the banks back like for like?
They type into their computer a figure with a currency symbol such as
£100,000
We could all start sending our banks electronic mail with the same amount
written with the symbol, like for like….
Here is the number you lent me £100,000 my debt is cleared
I don’t think there is a court in the world that could dispute that you are
paying back ex actually what you originally received?
There is great information in this video. But I really wish John
Witterick, would keep it brief, and get to the point. That makes a video
that should take 20 minutes, last an hour, and that is very
counter-productive. Thank you.
Money is just a concept. It only has value because we all believe it does.
apart from lentils, what/where should people invest?
Great talk to inspire people.
Unless the people acquire the knowledge AND act in unison, the system will
exploit their ignorance and [justifiable] fear. We have seen the evictions
taking place across the US and in countries like Spain. The game is rigged
and continues viause of the normalcy bias [it can’t happen here/to me,
etc] and ‘divide & rule’.
.
An email from the Maranoa, in convenient message-sized parts. Re.
G20,
Gender Institute & the proposed W-20,
dates 26th & 27th of Sep 2014,
article “Manage Your Own Health: Minister”, Stanthorpe Border Post,
concerning Springborgs asking for our better self discipline,
Jury duty,
Government Payments,
the 200 million dollar insurance of casinos & cigarette companies besides a
quickly populating Australian muslim society,
trial gm areal cholera vaccines over Australia without consent (forced
invasive methods),
laws promoted as freedoms having in fact the opposite effect eg. abortion
legalization & doctors rights to freedom of conscience,
conventional Marriage,
Vlad vs Ukraine,
etc.
Pg 1/7: Question: What may be the fate of our children & our aged due to
roles of men & women in society these days, compared to what they were
before a government payment was easy to come by? Once, a man was able to
put food on the table for 7. He supplied the textbooks, paid the bills, &
bought his wife a dress or the appliances she’d like. She liked to take
care of their family, & was there to pick up the loose ends, sewed the
buttons, & compared child discipline measures with the ladies in the
street. (Has it occured to anyone, that not only are we now no longer
qualified to smack our children, that neither are we qualified now to not?)
A man wished to support his loved ones & understood there was no social
security to foster an unwanted wife or widowed mother to. And a woman, well
she knew that realistically, to marry strictly based on promises to love
one another was irresponsible, as she may only find herself hungry, unable
to ovulate, carry children to team or to breastfeed. We were married in the
interest of the economy, & of children, & weather male or female, one stood
to be rejected if weren’t dependable. We were not married for our expertise
at love, & neither was to fall out of love an acceptable reason for divorce
as it is considered now-days. Love was a learnt thing, & an act to
patiently improve upon. (Notice, that many couples today who’d been
‘gunshot’ forced to marry, are some of the longest to remain married?) Now
though, you can simply paint me tabby & feed me chum, as heterosexual
non-supporters of same-sex marriage are rioted against :-/, called bigots
and asked why they want to deny those in love like heterosexual married
couples the right to be declared legally married :-/, yet at the same time
won’t criminalise divorce, so marriage as it is defined remains sacred.
..Why not try take the word marriage, & change the definition of it on
everyone it means something to, & call it a plight for marriage equality
when in actual fact it just be plain & simple invasion and theft (i
wonder)? (Who are we? Vlad Putan??) Why shouldn’t they call we who object
to ‘marriage equality’ bigots & oppressers, when for some time now,
heterosexual have themselves been marrying for love? To say homosexuals
were acting spoilt in requesting to do what we’ve been doing lately, would
just be, the-pot-calling-the-kettle-(Oh for petes sake, it’s politically
incorrect to finish that phrase these days), wouldn’t you say? But, why is
it homosexuals can’t finally invent their own word and definition according
to what they tent to do? Doesn’t true equality mean to live in peace
betwixt one another, not to stigmatise eachother for our preferences, or
feel pushed to share though change what we identify ourselves as? Again,
who are we? Vlad Putan? ..Now it may very well be both normal and natural
for a percentage of any species to have homosexual tendencies,
Pg. 2/7: & yes for other reasons included, any couple might remain
partnered, which if human may be great for the economy, but what of their
partnership being in the best interest of children? Many homosexual couples
would either like to adopt, or intend to conceive a child they’ll then
raise with their spouse, but, weather anyone likes it or not :-/, it’s not
yet been proven weather it be nurture or nature which plays the mostpart in
influencing a child’s making one of the 1st decisions they’ll make on their
own, what sex they identify as. This possible life-choice, vital to who
they may grow up to become, is made by each child before the age of 3. Now,
also concerning unconventional marriage, let’s talk about the feminist
movement, who’d professed to our own mothers that they as women should feel
enriched & proud to be independent. Today they tend to undermine individual
women’s different &/or time-trialed methods defensively, as though we’d
sought to provoke them to fight with us. As though we’d blogged them
directly on our husbands behalves & were in fact weak willed to be & say
who we are. They act as heroes against women being shamed, when it’s rather
only their own kind they don’t see as being shameful. To not think of
ourselves the way they say we should, we are considered by them loudly &
matter-of-factly to be a threat to womankind. Now. People insisted Hitler
must’ve been right too once, & maybe still even do, but rather he, like the
feminist movement, pit side against side by 1st pitting his own sides sides
against one another to conform them. Watch out, men of mankind lol.
Feminists are now all around me. In fact the adoption of the way of life is
so widespread now, that most feminists won’t even think to announce they’re
one, in the dark that they are, not decided to be one for their own
reasons. These will say, “It’s the 21st century. That we need to work too,
and take chemical contraceptives is just the way things are”. Well, they
may as well be saying, “It’s Germany early 1940s, & how i’ll behave is
expected of all of us, don’t you know stupid?”. Feminism, i wonder, is like
a bear come in from the winter cold, who rips up your bearskin shag you’re
supposed to know so well, your beautiful womankind, just to turf her over
the fenceline & take her place in your home. I wonder feminism is a great
blasphemer, been riding aided by men of government since the dawn of her
time, & of all those not born and raised by husbands and their wives
because of her, we’ve almost a living memories worth. 100 years is all it’s
taken for the old ways to die with those who knew them if they are
suppressed that long. Governments might like us to believe that it was the
world-wars what changed the world, but i wonder it was the reserve bank
leading people to become relaxed and social-security-thirsty, for it was in
our governments best interest we drifted apart, stopped being accountable
for one another, and relied on them.
Pg 3/7: I feel our Judiciary wallow, & it would please many of them to see
Australia packing with uninformed jurors, who’ve no culture they remember
to protect the values and circumstances of. (Next thing you know, it’ll be
Sharia all Over the place, the word Christian in
democratic-Christian-nation being said to be offensive. (Btw, if by
referendum a duel-law system is enstated here which would allow Shariah law
along with democracy in Australia, i’d like you to guess who’s law will
outweigh & control the freedoms of the other? I wouldn’t doubt, it would be
the very referendum to end all referendums. Julia B, Malcom T & Clive are
interested in the idea of Australia becoming a republic. A republic without
it’s guns is actually called a dictatorship, is it not. A tribunal system
would save them from a lot of their having to otherwise deal with appeals
from people of the public against them and their judgements they make
decisions based on. I think we need to recall why we have a constitution in
the 1st place, don’t you? Oh, & Pauline likes the idea of our becoming a
republic also, and only last year claimed our government should receive
money from the islamic council. Tobacco companies aren’t depopulating
enough people as it is, it seems. Sorry. Bad joke. Freedom of speech &
religion, i wonder, is hanging in the balance, but the young these days,
now in generations of us, wouldn’t realize that, and it just might seem
right to them one day to simply push us over the over the edge ..all of
us). Anyhow, i still dream of a deserving man, to iron the shirt for &
massage of an evening, knowing we have the best family in town which
human-services didn’t have to help us pay for *wishes i hadn’t thrown out
the loverly apron and kitchenware my mother’d given me i’d looked down on
wearing when young. Yes i am one who’s not so good in the kitchen.). I’d
need him to understand i involve myself in politics and would need to
travel & make prints from time to time, and he would not think my attending
church a waste of time either. I’m guessing that for a very long time, we
havn’t been actually forced out of our homes and from our families to work
as independent people, but acted as some kind of backbone in a world the
word marriage was once regarded so highly. Remember? Please won’t someone
remember us? We were the backbone? *..cries.* I can’t believe the state
we’re in. Don’t you think there needs to be found some happy medium between
what we are and what we were, without accusations of “luddist” being thrown
in common peoples faces? Please understand Australias children increasingly
lack in self-confidence, are depressed, many bastardized, and will sink us
all and all we hold dear if we won’t educate them on their rights.
Pg 4/7: For example, parents have little right to divorce. I don’t trust
this up-and-coming next generation, & though i feel silly crying to you,
please, i need someone to hear me & take this dire matter of our being
constructively abandoned by our government to heart, before i may say no
more :'(. For many years we haven’t told you what to do, haven’t had to
solely support ourselves and your children, and our men they let a bunch of
‘liberationalists’ say we women do not need them anymore? How could they
not know this decision we’d make would hang us all? Since a bunch of hairy
women spoke for us saying we don’t need our men, women have ravaged the
workforce, the demand for work has gone up, & it now takes 2 working adults
to pay the rent. To rear more than one child, we need now move in a
flatmate to sit while we work, orelse we’ll take an extra job to be able to
afford adequate daycare and medical, meanwhile rising over yet another tax
threshold. Or i could just go on the pension, fostered, so it be neither
here nor there if my man decides not to come home to us one day. Otherwise,
modern single women, once with 3 plus children (to two or more men now
likely mind you) feel they cannot claim defacto, as any recent partner they
have perhaps is also undependable, & mayn’t feed the children regardless of
her maximum entitlement being lost, biological fathers pay their
maintenance to fund. So it is that it really takes 3 men with one income
each, or one with 3, to suppport just a reasonable sized family a wife
might stay home to raise. (*hopes that to have 3 men in my life is still
only considered courting :-/*). Marriage, the voluntary union of a man & a
woman, in the interest of the economy & of children, to the exclusion of
all others, is under threat, been belittled for so long by (pardon me)
feminists and those worried they’ll be labeled misogynist for embracing
rolls of the sexes, that it’s crippling our young nation. I wonder that
during the liberation, men said “sure …have it all :)”, thinking there’d
be a time we’d say we’re sorry, and that we really mightn’t have asked for
so much to be happy in the end. That’s the laid back Aussie for ya. But
now, having demanded so much in defense of our freedoms, and making further
demands, has it occurred to anyone that ultimately women are defensive by
nature, and will never ever in fact feel free? &, that now we’d have to
move heaven & earth to find our balance once again? Heaven, partly because
women, maybe assuming we were having too much fun, and not liking it, may
raise pressure on yet this situation too (as we do).
Pg 5/7: Will i, over pipe-smoked screams of man-ladies, never be heard say
i’m sorry for not being more appreciative, i’ve decided it would be nice if
again i could just be a woman? And i don’t want to be shamed asked to
define what a woman is, only to then be laughed at. Females of our kind,
tend to in gangs pressure and look down on our other types of women, and
that they’ve been taught to believe so deep inside they feel they were
oppressed as wives nurturing families, how can i trust a single one to talk
to on this matter? Many Aussie men these days say they won’t date an
Australian woman. “They’re not loving enough”. An Australian woman won’t
smile anymore when their husband comes home of an evening. She can buy her
own dresses, & he can give himself a ruddy massage as far as she’s
concerned. See, when they were young, she (dressed provocatively instead of
putting up boundaries) feared if she needed him, that he would think she
was “too much hard work”. Which, tending to be a modern-day-male expecting
a modern-day-female, he Would’ve. Now though she is hard to look at, &
probably wouldn’t notice if he weren’t around. (Try telling a young male
it’s unethical not to suppport their woman, & notice the sour looks you’ll
get. The tolerance levels of Australian males having fallen, you’ll just be
taken as just trying to ruin their Good Time, orelse must be trying to
advocate prostitution, 4petes sake. :-/. I’m either to take care of myself,
orelse i’m a whore? Sounds like more liberationalist speak, as far as i’m
concerned :(. What women are refered to as, simply for needing what should
come naturally like breathing, does concern me, your wife, your daughter,
your very mother.) After all he, not thick skinned for her anymore, vents
intolerantly classing all his ideas as decisions like a child as he fumbles
for his any good possible use to her, while all the time she listens to
Nada. So sad. Of these men and women, and of the children had to couples
like these, i’m guessing we’ve some in parliament at present, with
unconventional values, loving complication and shirking tradition,
attempting to create more laws for which to write a stack of bi-laws about.
So many over the past couple of decades for eg. it seems had done uni with
climate-change in mind, & now a wall of them who plainly expect obs, now
stop at nothing to find a use for themselves. Say we legalized weed, then
oh lets limit the strength, fill it with chemicals and classify it a
federal offence to possess homegrown. Legalize abortion? Then say goodbye
to your doctor, whose rights to freedom of conscience revoked, could not by
law refuse someone the surgery. Be asked if you’d opt to abort on your job
application form, and watch the job of your dreams slip on by. Legalize
euthanasia, and say goodbye to being innocent before being accused as
guilty when a loved one dies, and say goodbye to what is already known as
our palliative-care system.
Pg 6/7: Create laws involving invasive methods such as breathalizing and
child vaccinations, then those who conform who’ll be afraid of being
penalized for not conforming, are classed as obviously not being against
invasive methods, & they may aswell not need sign to endure a mandated RFID
chip in their hand, or to breath in the stinkin new arial-cholera-trial
vaccine perhaps over your Australian region. Create more laws surrounding
women’s freedoms, and watch as we too turn into nothing like you expected.
But then, hang on a minute, i cannot say it is feminism either what’s
hurting society, but rather western government validating what it is &
funding it. I wonder what would’ve been of the wouldn’t-be children since
days we became able to foster & not need one another? Somewhere in this
country, right now, a would-be son who hadn’t been taught our tough
take-a-teaspoon-of-cement values, is wasted on the phone to a nursing home,
complaining they aren’t taking care of his mother. He’s restricted of
further building rooms on his home, and if she lived with him she’d not be
able to make a wage from growing her tomatoes anyway so couldn’t be a
contributing member of the house. Since social security, men pity
themselves, women who make for modern-day breadwinners refer to them as
children, & our children i suppose are then meant to pick up the pieces
..the backbone to be impacted upon. To sew the broken buttons, when it
should’ve been us! ..cries. Now tell me, if a stitch in time saves 9, then
how many stitches would you say we are behind? The answer is, likely none.
The whole pattern and stitchwork will be the governments doing, while all
we knew lies over the back fence. It ain’t just us women being turfed. Do
you understand? So much for our constitution, when it’s not taught so long
that we unwittingly disown ourselves. These last generations, again i’ll
say it, in the process of being “constructively abandoned” being dumbed
down, will inevitably suit the government intent on creating a culture for
us, desirable for it’s having it’s own and unquestioned dealings with us.
There is presently much shenanigans by our own going on against us, whether
presently you feel gone against or not.
Pg. 7/7: I feel that as far as many of our government are concerned, it is
we who pit the fight between how we once knew to be against how they’ll
prefer we be, which our children have been set to believe allows us to
progress. Our children i suggest, are like cattle on their one-way last
journey, thinking they’re off to greener pastures. Sad. Ukrainian, i think
i have a good instinct now for the dreaded human-traffic-vehicle, and this
one our government’s prepared for us, is as i see it, a real doozy sorry to
say :-/. It’s gotten so bad, that even those in our parliament can honestly
say, that neither they have any idea where our nation is headed. Something
about the economy. What Clive said today. It’s all just neusence garbage on
top of Garbage, can’t anyone see? ..About Face!!! ..Retreat i say!!
..Please!!! Won’t you understand that as a nation we grow weaker, not by
the generation or by the year now, but by the day, pandering to & funding
hostile fanatics seeking retribution, but who’ll continue to call their Own
selves the vulnerable, and ourselves the untrustworthy, regardless of how
much we change to suit them. (I was recently responded to on this topic
i’ve raised. The poor guy believed he’d actually lost brain-cells. Nothing
hearing.) Krystel Spicer (32) ✔Founder of debate platform CrazyLa at Airg
✔Campaign manager of Fairfax & Wide Bay area for Rise Up Australia Party,
in far right Greens Party oposition, ✔Niece of Matchy, creater/editor of
Australias only cycle mag, Live To Ride (RIP 2014), ✔Niece of Robert
Czolij, quantum physics professor Sydney University, ✔Grand cousin of
Eugene Czolij, President of World Congress Ukrain, ✔Raised by Liberal
members, one a born-again Christian & one curious philosopher type,
✔Belonging to the ancient line of those with the name spicer, recently
found to hold the sought-after haplogroup R1b1b1, the footprint of the
ancient celt now reaching in an arc shape from one side of Britain to the
other, and then some. ✔ Oh, & the 1st Liberal politician in Australia held
the last name Spicer.✔A philosopher type myself, of all christian churches
i’d have to say i prefer the Jehovah’s witness kingdom hall. I do not tend
to marry the church myself, but just find these people encouraging rather
than enabling. ✔My father who’s studied many many religions, is near Logan
atm, studying the quran and peacefully co-operating with the muslim
brotherhood. My sister on the other hand lives in a Paramatta mosqu zone,
and may no longer bleach her hair or walk alone for fear of being
stigmatised again. It’s already out of control where she’s living, and some
Islamic-Sharia-advocating muslims have made it hard for her to live
peacefully Australian. There is no such thing as peaceful Sharia law. A
muslim may not cherry pick the way Christians are known to. To follow
Sharia, one mustn’t condone any other faith or faith of sorts. Please think
about this for a second. Has it occured to you yet, that many Muslim
families are huge, their family’s economic, health & education situations
are better than many Westerners, and that, well um, by forty years time we
may have to subsidize those losses to casinos, tobaccco companies and the
like ..because Muslims will by then outnumber us, outsmart us, outlive us,
and CLOSE the above companies. So Anyway, my sister has had to do the
assimilating. I wonder how councils can happily approve mosques go right up
beside Christian churches? If a mosque is applied for, and if at all we
agree, can’t it be built provided 16 block Zone surrounding ..is BUSHLAND?
And they’ll PROTECT it wouldn’t they ? That’s improvising :). Oh & i spose,
if anyone’s confused, the name of the religion is Islam, the sacred law of
this religion is Sharia, and a follower of the lifestyle instructed by the
quran (a complete instruction manual unlike the Christian bible) is called
a muslim. If the quran seems confusing, know the 2nd half of the it, the
violent passages, Supersedes the 1st. Thankyou for your time, & have a
wonderful rest of your day, for times they are a changing aren’t they
..fast, way way too fast.
http://theReferralpay.com/?ref=36781
Thank You
Adam Smith was sent to college at the age of thirteen by his widowed mother
who worked for French Nobility. By nineteen he then tutored French Royalty
as an expert in Theology, History, Juris Prudence, and lastly an Economist.
His Classical Economic Theory scientifically proved the existence of the
Principle of Self Interest, Laws of Supply & Demand and his deliberate
metaphor to be synonymous with God/the Invisible Hand. We were all born
Capitalists proven by the fact based on Self Interest we take our first
breath. Self Interest is the engine of life for all living things. Adam
Smith’s Classical Ecn Theory is in perfect harmony with God’s answer to the
first question posed in Genesis, “Lord, am I my brother’s keeper”? God’s
answer was effectively the remainder of the Holy Bible, which repeatedly
teaches do the “right thing/Thy Will” which can be dependent upon
circumstances and as difficult to determine as the last bite that satisfies
our hunger before the one that constitutes gluttony.
Competitors/Capitalists in Free markets choosing to do the “right thing”
in/directly benefit everyone in the market/thy neighbor. Classical Economic
Theory scientifically proved the same self interest responsible for
generating abundance in free market economies, guarantees scarcity,
shortages and failure in controlled market economies (Socialism/Communism).
<---Not opinion, scientifically proven fact. Economics is a Social Science in the same College of Liberal Arts as the Physical Sciences, which have promoted an Evil Illusion for 100+ years based upon the original Piltdown man Hoax (1913-53) and a steady series of diabolical frauds presented as the missing link. Historically, money has taken many forms as a convenient means of economic exchange including feathers,beads, trinkets, precious metals, paper and even digital ethereal currency. The Principle of Self Interest determined/created the Laws of Supply & Demand, guided by the owner of the Invisible Hand. Science proved the existence of God over 250+ years ago, when Adam Smith published Theory of Moral Sentiments and Classical Economic Theory.
Basically to end this bullshit we need to illiminate interest on borrowing.
Then bankers wont be able to pull off this kind of crap, right?
Wonder what would happen if you got the bank to put your loan money into
your account as cash?
Bank & Credit Card Debt is False Money Owed – Get…:
http://youtu.be/950gZhK3s6M
The only way to fix this mess up and stop the looting of world economies
is the reintroduction of Glass -Steagall bank separation that will place
the Bankrupt Banks of Wall street & City of London into Bankruptcy and
liquidation wiping out all the phony debit .Then the Hamilton banks of
public credit must be reintroduced as the hub of the financial system .The
Oligarchs behind our present financial have been guarding it like their
forefathers .and to stop the Genius of Alexander Hamilton being
reintroduced they have killed presidents (Kennedy was going to
reintroduce it ) and they have started wars to stop it. If we introduce
these measures it will kill the British Empire off for good as it has
remained as a financial empire but as it rises as world ruling empire
again it is causing a lot of trouble around the world as it puts an end to
Free nation states. It has many world leaders as its agents and stooges
such as Obama & the Bushes ,heads of Government in countries Such as
Australia ,& Canada who bow to the corrupt British Throne.
excellent upload! money is actually just paper with no intrinsic value, the
real money is your life energy and bankers or governments should never
control our life energy, we should all create our own local monetary
systems like bitcoins, when hard working people lend paper money with
interest from the banking cartels, the people lose their homes, their cars
and the cops and everyone else come chasing after them for life, we get
treated like animals when we lose our underpaid jobs and can’t pay back
their fake money, but when banks fail, they get bailed out with our tax
money life energy, banks never get the same treatment from cops they are
known for when you desperately need a bail out yourself, time to unite and
fight and end this evil financial corruption in high places.
Is this one of the main reasons that no youngster that I know of have never
been taught anything regarding banking or credit cards, yet this is a big
part of our lives